Skip to main content
2027 IAC FINANCIAL REPORTING • LEVEL 3

IFRS 13 – Fair Value Measurement

A practical PGDA / IAC 2027 study guide covering the fair value framework, market-participant assumptions, valuation techniques, the fair value hierarchy, highest and best use, principal markets, disclosures and exam application.

1. What IFRS 13 does

IFRS 13 provides a single framework for measuring fair value when another IFRS requires or permits fair value measurement or disclosure. It defines fair value and establishes measurement and disclosure requirements.

Core idea: fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. The objective is to estimate the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
Identify
item & unit
→
Identify
market
→
Identify
market participants
→
Select
valuation technique
→
Use inputs
appropriately
→
Classify
Level 1–3
Important: IFRS 13 does not tell you when another IFRS requires fair value. It tells you how to measure fair value once fair value is required or permitted, subject to the Standard's scope.

2. 2027 IAC scope – know this exactly

The SAICA 2027 Principles of Examination lists IFRS 13 at Level 3, with an important limitation: it applies to fair value measurement guidance relating to items that are included in the syllabus.

2027 IAC treatmentWhat it means for your study
Level 3 IFRS 13Be able to apply fair value principles to syllabus transactions and solve integrated problems.
Support for syllabus topicsIFRS 13 is pervasive: use it where another included IFRS/topic requires fair value measurement.
Excluded: paragraphs 34–47These deal with applications to liabilities and an entity's own equity instruments.
Excluded: paragraphs 48–56These deal with offsetting positions.
Study strategy: learn the general IFRS 13 framework thoroughly, but for your 2027 IAC preparation pay particular attention to the specific syllabus transactions where fair value arises.

3. Fair value – the definition

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

Exit price

Think exit, not entry. For an asset, what could be received on sale? For a liability, what would be paid to transfer it?

Measurement date

Fair value is determined at the measurement date using conditions and assumptions that market participants would use at that date.

Orderly transaction

Assumes normal market exposure and marketing activities—not a forced transaction or distressed sale.

Market participants

Use assumptions that market participants would use, not management's own intended transaction assumptions.

FAIR VALUE = market-participant exit price at the measurement date in an orderly transaction

Fair value is not:

  • an entity-specific value based simply on management's intentions;
  • necessarily the price actually paid in the original transaction;
  • a forced-sale price;
  • the same thing as value in use under IAS 36.

4. Market and market participants

Principal market

The principal market is the market with the greatest volume and level of activity for the asset or liability that the entity can access at the measurement date.

Most advantageous market

If there is no principal market, fair value is measured using the most advantageous market—the market that maximises the amount received for an asset or minimises the amount paid to transfer a liability, after taking transaction costs into account.

Exam trap: transaction costs are not an adjustment to fair value. They are characteristics of the transaction and are accounted for separately. However, transaction costs are considered when identifying the most advantageous market.

Market participant assumptions

  • Independent of the reporting entity.
  • Knowledgeable and reasonably informed.
  • Able to enter into the transaction.
  • Willing to enter into the transaction, but not forced or compelled.

5. The asset or liability being measured

Unit of account vs unit of valuation

The unit of account is determined under the relevant IFRS. IFRS 13 generally measures fair value consistently with the unit of account established by the applicable IFRS.

Characteristics of an asset or liability

Fair value measurement considers characteristics that a market participant would take into account, such as the condition and location of an asset and restrictions on its sale or use, when those characteristics are relevant.

Highest and best use – non-financial assets

For a non-financial asset, fair value considers the asset's highest and best use from a market participant perspective.

Physically possible

The use must be physically possible considering the asset's characteristics.

Legally permissible

The use must comply with legal restrictions.

Financially feasible

The use must generate adequate economic returns after considering the investment required.

Key point: highest and best use is determined from a market-participant perspective, even if the entity currently intends a different use.

6. Valuation techniques

IFRS 13 requires a valuation technique appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are available. The objective is to maximise the use of relevant observable inputs and minimise the use of unobservable inputs.

TechniqueBasic ideaTypical examples
Market approachUses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets, liabilities or groups.Quoted prices, market multiples, comparable transactions.
Cost approachReflects the amount that would currently be required to replace the service capacity of an asset.Current replacement cost for specialised assets.
Income approachConverts future amounts—cash flows or income/expenses—to a single current amount using a discount rate.Present value, discounted cash flow, option-pricing models.
A valuation technique is selected to maximise the use of relevant observable inputs and minimise the use of unobservable inputs. Techniques should be applied consistently when appropriate, although a change may be justified when it results in a measurement that is equally or more representative of fair value.

7. Fair value hierarchy – Level 1, 2 and 3

The hierarchy prioritises the inputs used in the valuation, not the valuation technique itself.

LevelInputMemory rule
Level 1Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity can access at the measurement date.Identical + quoted + active market + accessible.
Level 2Inputs other than Level 1 quoted prices that are observable, directly or indirectly.Observable, but not Level 1.
Level 3Unobservable inputs.Market-participant assumptions using significant unobservable inputs.
Common mistake: “The valuation model is complicated, therefore Level 3.” Not necessarily. A complex model can use Level 2 inputs. Classification depends on the inputs significant to the measurement.

Important hierarchy rule

If a measurement uses inputs from different levels, the entire fair value measurement is classified at the lowest level input that is significant to the entire measurement.

8. Valuation adjustments and uncertainty

Bid–ask spreads

When a quoted price represents a bid and ask spread, IFRS 13 permits the price within the bid-ask spread that is most representative of fair value to be used, regardless of where the input is classified within the hierarchy.

Mid-market pricing

Other pricing conventions used by market participants as a practical expedient may be used if they are consistent with the objective of fair value measurement.

Day-one differences

Where the transaction price differs from fair value at initial recognition, the relevant IFRS determines the treatment of that difference. For a financial instrument, IFRS 9 contains specific requirements; do not automatically recognise every difference in profit or loss.

Uncertainty

Level 3 measurements require careful consideration of assumptions, valuation techniques and sensitivity to reasonably possible alternative assumptions where disclosure requirements apply.

9. Fair value disclosures

IFRS 13 requires disclosures that help users assess the valuation techniques and inputs used to develop fair value measurements and, for recurring Level 3 measurements, understand the effect of significant unobservable inputs.

AreaWhat to know
Fair value hierarchyDisclose fair value measurements by hierarchy level as required.
Valuation techniquesExplain the valuation techniques and significant inputs used.
Level 3 recurring measurementsAdditional disclosures include reconciliation information and information about significant unobservable inputs.
SensitivityFor recurring Level 3 measurements, disclose quantitative information about significant unobservable inputs and sensitivity requirements where applicable.
Non-recurring measurementsApply the specific IFRS 13 disclosure requirements relevant to non-recurring fair value measurements.
Remember: disclosure requirements depend on whether the fair value measurement is recurring or non-recurring and on the level within the hierarchy. Learn the structure rather than treating every fair value disclosure as identical.

10. IAC exam approach

Step 1 – Find the underlying IFRS

Ask: Why are we measuring this item at fair value? Start with IAS 2, IAS 16, IAS 40, IAS 41 where included, IFRS 3, IFRS 9, share-based payment requirements, or another applicable standard.

Step 2 – Confirm IFRS 13 applies

IFRS 13 is the measurement framework where another IFRS requires or permits fair value, subject to scope exceptions.

Step 3 – Identify the item and unit of account

Determine what exactly is being measured and apply the relevant IFRS's unit-of-account requirements.

Step 4 – Identify the market

Principal market?
→
If none: most advantageous market
→
Market-participant assumptions

Step 5 – Consider highest and best use

For a non-financial asset, test physical possibility, legal permissibility and financial feasibility.

Step 6 – Select valuation technique

Market, cost or income approach. Maximise relevant observable inputs and minimise unobservable inputs.

Step 7 – Identify inputs and hierarchy

Determine whether significant inputs are Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3. Remember that the overall classification follows the lowest level input that is significant to the measurement.

Step 8 – Check disclosure

Consider hierarchy, technique, inputs, Level 3 reconciliation, sensitivity and recurring/non-recurring requirements.

Exam answer structure: applicable IFRS → fair value objective → market → item characteristics → highest and best use (if relevant) → valuation technique → inputs → hierarchy → calculation → disclosure.

11. Common exam traps

TrapCorrect thinking
“Fair value = what the company paid.”Fair value is an exit price at the measurement date; transaction price can differ.
“Use management's intended use.”Fair value is market-based. For non-financial assets, consider highest and best use from a market-participant perspective.
“Most advantageous market is always used.”Use the principal market if one exists and the entity can access it; otherwise consider the most advantageous market.
“Transaction costs are deducted from fair value.”They are considered when identifying the most advantageous market, but are not a characteristic of the asset/liability and are not an adjustment to fair value.
“Complex model = Level 3.”Hierarchy classification is based on the inputs significant to the measurement.
“One Level 3 input means everything is Level 3.”The measurement is classified based on the lowest level input that is significant to the entire measurement.
“Observable inputs always mean Level 1.”Level 1 is specifically quoted prices in active markets for identical items that are accessible at the measurement date.
“IFRS 13 tells you when to use fair value.”The relevant IFRS determines whether fair value is required or permitted; IFRS 13 provides the measurement framework.
“Highest and best use applies to every asset.”It is a concept for non-financial assets.

12. Study checklist

0 / 20 completed

13. One-page brain dump

IFRS 13 = fair value measurement framework.

Fair value: exit price at measurement date in orderly transaction between market participants.

Market-based: not entity-specific.

Principal market: greatest volume and level of activity accessible to entity.

No principal market: most advantageous market.

Transaction costs: relevant to identifying most advantageous market, not an adjustment to fair value.

Non-financial asset: highest and best use.

HBU: physically possible + legally permissible + financially feasible.

Techniques: market + cost + income.

Objective: maximise relevant observable inputs; minimise unobservable inputs.

Level 1: quoted price, active market, identical item, accessible.

Level 2: observable inputs other than Level 1.

Level 3: unobservable inputs.

Overall hierarchy: lowest-level input significant to entire measurement determines classification.

Disclosures: hierarchy + technique + inputs + Level 3 information/sensitivity as applicable.

2027 IAC: Level 3, but only for fair value measurement guidance relating to syllabus items; paras 34–47 and 48–56 are specifically excluded.

IFRS 13 PGDA / IAC 2027 Study Guide
Prepared as a study aid. The 2027 IAC scope is based on the SAICA Principles of Examination supplied for this study project. Use the applicable IFRS Accounting Standards and prescribed university materials for authoritative wording and detailed application.